Friday, 30 April 2010

#BeMyGuest Post: Open Mic Night For Gordon Brown by Elissa Freeman

A special #BeMyGuest post...

I've been pestering Elissa Freeman (@ElissaPR) to write a guest post for my Blog for a while...and after you read her take on the Gordon Brown Gaffe (from a Canadian perspective), you'll understand why.

Elissa is the Director of Public Relations / Public Affairs for the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, so she knows her stuff, but it is her genuine and enthusiastic nature which makes her one of my favourite people to follow on Twitter.

So, without further ado, let's get into it...


Open Mic Night For Gordon Brown by Elissa Freeman

We Canadians have a particular affinity for the Brits. Indeed, we whip ourselves into a frenzy when the Royals visit. And those of us who are old enough, still know the words to God Save The Queen. But no matter how loudly we sing, we realize that even God can’t save Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

In true Canadian style, we can’t help but feel a twinge of sympathy for Mr. Brown – and especially for his PR team. The Canadian morning shows were all abuzz about the verbal shot heard ‘round the world about calling Mrs. Gillian Duffy “a bigoted woman”, yet the tone was somewhat empathetic rather than an out-and-out gloat.

The Gordon Brown Gaffe reminds all PR pros that a minor slip in protocol can wreak havoc. The Gaffe falls under the most basic principles of preventative PR: nothing is ever off the record…especially when you’re attached to a live mic.

I can’t tell you how many times I’ve chased one of my spokespeople down the corridor because we forgot to disengage the mic. It’s easy to forget, mind you; the cameraman wires up your spokesperson, there’s great concentration on the messages to be disseminated, the interview finishes and off you go.

The speed at which the most minor of details could derail a tightly reigned-in PR plan was frightening. The speed at which the crisis communications plan kicked into action was admirable. First, a media apology, then a personal apology, followed by a wrap-up statement with the press.

Personally, I would have wished that mic was still on during Mr. Brown’s 45-minute dressing down with the highly offended Mrs. Duffy. What was even more interesting? Mrs. Duffy was nowhere to be seen when the Prime Minister faced the press immediately thereafter. In a best case scenario, she should have been by his side, accepting his apology. Maybe that’s why one in four Brits didn’t find Mr. Brown’s apology as being genuine.

Try as we may to control the message, human frailty doesn’t allow a PR pro to have power over everything. In this case, a live mic could be the death knell for Gordon Brown’s re-election bid.
______________________________

I hope you enjoyed Elissa's take on what will probably go down as one of the most public gaffe's in recent history.

In addition to the points she's made above, the other thing that struck me about how this panned out was how the event was amplified by social media - five years ago YouTube was only a week old and Twitter didn't exist - would this have be as scrutinized as heavily without the mass adoption of social media we now currently enjoy?

If you'd like to leave a comment, please drop it in the box below...but just remember, the whole world is watching...listening...reading... ;)

Wednesday, 28 April 2010

How to 'manually' measure, increase and maintain your Twitter engagement goals (Part one: Measurement)

By Adam Vincenzini

Influence. There, I said it. I will not mention it again in this post.

Why?

Simple. Engagement is the heart of social media...for brands and for individuals.

Engagement paves the way for connections and relationships.

It 'pumps the life' through your social media presence.

So, with this in mind, I'd like to share a three-part post with you that includes:

- Part one: Measuring / benchmarking your current engagement levels;

- Part two: How you can increase your level / quality of engagement; and

- Part three: Maintaining your 'improved' levels of engagement

Let's get to it...

Part one: Measurement / Benchmarking

Instead of taking the obvious route and directing you to the plethora of Twitter influence tools that include some engagement measurement metrics, I want to take you through a more 'manual' approach that blends both quantitative and qualitative data.

This will give you a better understanding of what engagement entails, from the bottom up, helping to shape the improvements you can make (outlined in part two).

Metric 1: @ replies / mentions

Twitter is about conversations, giving and sharing...and the same goes for engagement.

This can initially be gauged by how often you 'reply to' or 'mention' other people in your tweets ('re-tweets' are also an element of 'mentions').

The simplest way to do this is by using TweetStats.com - which is a great source for all types of information relating to your tweeting patterns - but the section of most interest is the example featured below:


In this example, more than 50% of @EmilyCagle's tweets are 'people-orientated' - which is great - in other words she 'interacts' more than she 'broadcasts' - this should be your aim.

The simplicity of this statistic / graph is the key - it is also worth checking out your 're-tweet' percentage which features in the same results page.

2. Metric two: 'Actual' conversations

A 'conversation' is an exchange of thoughts / opinions between two or more people.

An actual conversation is 'several' exchanges - this is where real relationships develop / grow.

A simple 'manual' way of seeing how conversational you really are is to use search.twitter.com.

Just tap your username into the search box and look for a result that contains the 'show conversation' drop down box.

Here's an example:



This is an 'actual' conversation - not just one exchange, or a 'via @joebloggs' mention.

Obviously, not every exchange needs to evolve to this stage, but have a poke around your results and see how many 'long' conversations you have participated in - it'll tell you a lot about your Twitter mentality / approach.

Metric three: Cross-platform migration

Sorry, but more manual investigation is required here.

Take a look at the people you follow and select a sample - say 50 or 100 people - and ask yourself this question: Have you solidified your connection elsewhere?

By that I mean, have you connected on Facebook? Linked up on LinkedIn? Exchanged emails? Commented on that person's Blog? Met in real life?



If you've been able to 'develop' a good portion of these relationship by taking them to other 'places' you are taking engagement to a very important next level.

If you can't say you've taken things further with many people from your sample, it's a good indicator that you aren't engaging that well.

Now, you're probably thinking to yourself: "Man, that's hard work, can I just go to something like Klout.com or Twitalyzer.com and get an engagement score?"

You can, and my advice is to use those tools as well, to compliment this process.

But, the beauty of taking this approach is that YOU'RE doing the work.

YOU'RE actually discovering how you engage by looking at raw data / information.

Next steps

After you've conducted your 'manual' assessment and coupled that with one of the automated tools in existence you'll have two things:

1. A more tangible feeling for how you interact online

2. Some benchmark scores which will come in handy down the line, especially for part three (maintenance)

I think you'll be quite amazed at what you learn by taking the more manual approach - it may simply reaffirm your casual estimations, or shed some real light on what you are doing well and what you can improve on.

How you can 'enhance' your engagement is what lies ahead in part two of this series.

Until then, get digging...and let this process reinforce one more key lesson: social media is a marathon, not a sprint, and the more gently you tackle the initial stages, the stronger you'll be in the long-term as a result.

Adam

Sunday, 25 April 2010

Not reading newspapers is making me happier...seriously.

By Adam Vincenzini

Day 115 of The 2010 'Newspaper-less' Experiment

The last newspaper I bought / read was an edition of The Sun on the 31st of December 2009.

Knowing that I was about to enter this experiment, I made note of most of the major headlines in the first 30 pages of the paper.

I took a look back at those headlines the other day and came to a conclusion: Not reading newspapers is making me happier.

Is that a sweeping, general and self-serving statement? Possibly.

But, if you'll indulge me, let's take a look at a handful of those headlines and have a think about how they make you feel...


Now, imagine not being subjected to these headlines first thing in the morning for 115 days.

In the place of 'physical' newspapers, I have been getting my news through every other outlet imaginable.

So, I haven't been avoiding news completely, if anything my consumption has increased, but I choose what I read rather than letting it choose me...and generally I choose not to read about suicides, bombs and guns.

Is not reading stories like this making me narrow?

Am I shying away from the 'real' world?

Or am I simply not letting my day start with an unhealthy dose of negativity?

After 115 days of this experiment I still don't know the answer, but I 'feel' happier and more positive about the world...can you blame me?!?

Adam Vincenzini

The media's 'tortoise and hare race' is about to get ugly...

By Adam Vincenzini

In the last 48 hours, two articles that originated in 'traditional' media (aka the tortoise), but wound up being shared heavily in 'social' media circles (aka the hare), have been playing on my mind.

These two articles neatly sum up the real problems facing mass media, particularly newspapers.

The ironic part? Both articles were about trends 'developing' in social media.

Let me explain...

The offending articles

First up, The Guardian posed this question: Is Foursquare the next Twitter?

Talk about getting to the dance a little more than fashionably late.

This debate has been raging in social media circles for months.

Then the Daily Mail had a pop at chatroulette, making it out to be an immoral scandal (no surprises there), but again, that ship set sail weeks ago.

Unfortunately, both publications couldn't have possibly broached either subject any earlier because it would have been 'beyond' their audiences (especially as most of their readers are still trying to get their heads around Twitter).

But it's not the subject matter which is the problem.

It's the antiquated notion of 'audiences'.

The Guardian and Daily Mail are forced to cater to a very rigid readership profile.

Social media, on the other hand, has paved way for a totally bespoke form of news - shaped to suit each individual person's needs and wants.

(Actually, a great example of this is paper.li - the online daily newspaper constructed from your Twitter stream - it is customized based on who you follow and what you are interested in - here's my latest edition)

What can newspapers do?

Well they can't produce 6 billion editions a day...can they?

Sadly, no matter which way you look at it, physical 'papers' don't have many places to run.

They can't be customized.

They can't be personalized.

And they can't be monetized.

Will iPads save the day?

Will quality journalism survive beyond all these changes?

Or will these outlets stop playing safe and get back to setting trends, instead of jumping on them six months late?

The media outlets that make 'people' the centre of their product, instead of 'audiences' will not only survive, but they'll probably thrive.

If they don't, we might be in the process of witnessing the first time the tortoise loses out to the hare...and then what do we do...re-write that?!?

Adam

Note: This post is part of my year-long series look at media consumption, based heavily around an experiment I'm conducting which involves not reading physical newspapers for 12 months - for more information about the experiment, click here.

Thursday, 22 April 2010

Twitter Pitching Etiquette: What works, what doesn’t...

Some of America and Britain's most prominent ‘tweeting’ journalists give their view...


By Lacey Haines (@laceyhaines), K/F Communications, San Francisco and Adam Vincenzini (@adamvincenzini), Paratus Communications, London.

Social media has created incredible opportunities and challenges for public relations professionals.  While the challenges have been well documented, the opportunities that have arisen are just as important. Social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, if used effectively, can help build relationships, identify new trends and help facilitate networking with like-minds throughout the industry.

One of the most profound and positive developments has been the breaking down of the walls between PR and the media. In one click you can find the most relevant reporters to the story you’re pitching, obtain a better understanding of what they like and what they’re interested in by reading their feed, get a direct link to their blog or website, and network with them via @reply or DM.

But what do journalists think about this transparency?  Using social media, we asked our press network in the USA and UK how they felt about being pitched directly via social media sites. While responses were mixed, we noticed some trends.

KEEP YOUR PITCHES SHORT: E-mail pitches are still too long, and several people we heard from preferred a 140-character pitch on Twitter, to a traditional one via e-mail.

DIRECT MESSAGES ARE BETTER THAN @REPLY: Reporters can’t “opt-in” to pitches, but they can with Twitter. If there is a mutual following between PR people and a reporter, it usually means they know each other, and may welcome a direct message more than a longer e-mail pitch. A reporter for a major US business daily (who asked not to be quoted) said that he only follows PR people he knows or has worked with in the past, and prefers DM to @reply because he wouldn’t want competitors to know who he’s speaking with.

TWITTER PITCHES ARE NOVEL: A journalist for the News of the World(UK) said that but only one or two direct messages, so pitches made through Twitter stand out more.
And even if there isn’t a direct relationship in the beginning, pitching on Twitter has helped reporters and PR people build relationships that continue on e-mail or in person.
One of the more detailed responses was courtesy of Martin Stabe, Editor of Retail Week, one of the UK’s leading trade publications:
“For me, Twitter is a place to share ideas and links with like-minded friends and colleagues in online journalism and increasingly, to monitor sources of news and information.
By all means, join our conversation, but don't "pitch" me anything out of the blue unless we already know each other and you know that it's relevant.
I probably follow you if you've joined the conversations I'm part of before, so DM me with your idea, or look up my email and ping something over.
Some of the best relationships - on email and on the phone - I have with PRs are people who I also know on Twitter.”
But not everyone was for social media pitching. A features writer for Style Magazine and a Businessweek editor both said they preferred e-mail to Twitter pitching. And one editor said that a big problem with Twitter DMs is that not everyone checks their direct messages often enough.

Another trend was that several preferred all Twitter pitches be followed up with an e-mail.

Start building relationships with reporters online, learn what THEY want to write about (vs. what you want them to write about), and your pitches will be much more effective.

Lacey, commenting on Twitter and PR said:

After a reporter covers a client of mine, I’ll tweet it out, with their Twitter handle attached. For time sensitive pitches, I’ll @reply the reporter I need to reach and ask for them to follow me so I can DM.  I would never do this if I wasn’t positive that my story was relevant to the reporter.  This has been very helpful as not only gaining coverage for clients, but building long-term relationships.
Adam added:
I like the push-pull element of Twitter and the media. If I spot a journalist I follow tweeting about a subject that has links to my client, I can approach that journalist to provide help / assistance. It makes being collaborative a much easier and beneficial process.
**Thank you to Matt Honan (Freelance writer, and WIRED magazine contributing editor), Maggie Shiels (Silicon Valley Correspondent, BBC), Scott McGrew (tech reporter for NBC Bay Area; host of Press:Here, and producer of TechNow), Christina Warren (tech blogger for Mashable), Harry Wallop (Consumer Editor of The Daily Telegraph), Vikki Chowney (Editor of Reputation Online), Leila Makki (Telecom.TV), Chris Milton (veteran independent journalist), Martin Stabe (Editor, Retail Week), Dan Martin (Editor of BusinessZone.co.uk) for agreeing to be quoted for this article. 
____________________________

Lacey Haines is a PR Program Manager at K/F Communications in San Francisco where she contributes to the day-to-day management of her account teams, as well as the long-term PR and social media plans for her clients, which have included Digg, TwitVid, Flock, and RowNine.  In 2008, Lacey successfully placed Digg founder, Kevin Rose, on the cover of Inc. magazine, winning K/F Communications the 2009 Gold Hermes Creative Award from the Association of Marketing and Communications Professionals.  Lacey blogs at laceyhaines.com and can be found on Twitter here: @laceyhaines

Adam Vincenzini is the lead social media consultant at Paratus Communications in London where he advises the agency's clients on how to shape communications activity around the end-user / participant. Adam was previously responsible for digital communications at Cricket Australia which included managing the 150,000-strong official fan community of the Australia Cricket Team. Adam blogs regularly at the COMMS corner and can be found on Twitter here: @AdamVincenzini

Tuesday, 20 April 2010

An Interview with Deirdre Breakenridge: Reinventing PR's Relationship with Itself

"Whenever you're in conflict with someone, there is one factor that can make the difference between damaging your relationship and deepening it. That factor is attitude." - William James

I don't think I've 'met' many people with a more positive and holistic attitude towards relationships than Deirdre Breakenridge.

In her most recent book, Putting the Public Back in Public Relations (co-written with Brian Solis), the importance of re-establishing 'relationships' as the foundation for great PR is arguably the key theme.

In fact, the great relationship I've been able to strike up with Deirdre via social media in the last six months was the key factor in my decision to buy and read her latest book.

So it made sense for me, once I finished the book, that 'relationships' was the theme I'd quiz her on...and this is what she had to say...

An interview with Deirdre Breakenridge

One Topic. Four questions. Hundreds of talking points.

Q1. Media relationships

Adam Vincenzini (AV): Was any one single factor responsible for taking 'relationships' out of media relations?

Deirdre Breakenridge (DB): There were several factors that took the ‘relationships’ out of media relations. PR people were faced with the pressure from their clients to produce more media coverage with less time and with a smaller budget.  At the same time, the media was becoming increasingly hard to reach as they struggled with their own deadlines and stresses to produce stories quickly to keep up with the pace of the Internet.  Desk side briefings and reporter lunches were just a memory of the past.

One of the most pressing problems (or maybe to some it appeared as a solution) was our ability to use technology to simply broadcast news announcements from email blasts to wire service distribution, without making that personal connection with the media.  Through the process, we moved farther away from the relationship-building techniques; a practice we had relied on for years as part of our PR media relations approach.

Today, whether it’s media relations with journalists or building relationships with other groups of people in web communities, there’s only one way to practice PR and that’s using the people relations approach.

Brian and I wrote our book to focus on Putting the Public Back in Public Relations which means you need to listen to the people that matter, make direct connections with them and be a valuable resource, which is critical for a brand.

PR professionals are practicing their people relations with different groups (even beyond the media) in social communities, including with their brands’ customers.There’s also a strong focus on the new players or influencers. Although media relations will continue to be a part of our jobs and we will change the way that we connect and engage with today’s journalists, we’ve come to realize that bloggers are important to the news process and consumers are relying on them for information, intelligence and entertainment. Building relationships with bloggers requires an understanding of their interests and participating in their communities.Bloggers, like journalists, want to provide useful information to the people who rely on them daily, so it’s critical to do your homework and connect with bloggers on a level that builds credibility, trust and mutual respect.

Today, building relationships means listening to what your customers are saying and hearing their thoughts and acting upon their concerns, problems and questions. Today’s brands have the opportunity to become valuable resources for the public. No longer are we allowed to just build our relationships the way we think they should be formed.

If you recall, back in the day, there were PR firms that would start a media relations program and “building a relationship” by generating a media list. The agency would send a journalist a news release, introducing the company and announcing their news.The follow-up call on that very news release was a means to discuss the company announcement. That’s hardly a way to build a relationship.There was no listening involved.

We have incredible listening (monitoring) tools and technology that provides us with real time information about our brands and the people who take the time to converse about them. If you listen to the people you want to reach, customize your stories and really target and act upon their needs, the relationships you build will be stronger and last long term; these are the relationships that are built on empathy, trust, and loyalty.

Q2. The value of 'any' relationship

AV: In the book you and Brian talk a lot about the importance of making relationships the foundation of successful PR, not just with media, but consumers, broader stakeholders etc. However, relationships, by their very nature, take an awful lot of time to create and foster – can the industry expect clients / brands to pay for this time? And, how much is this skill / service worth?

DB: Relationships definitely take time to cultivate and trust develops as people feel a mutual respect and understanding, a sense of similar beliefs, and there is a level of reciprocation on behalf of both parties.  For some, the traditional PR process took much longer to build relationships because they were less focused on what people were saying and more focused on pushing out messages to the market (whether consumers cared about the communication or not).  For example, messages were handed down from the C-Suite and then worked into news releases, which were sent out over the wire; a mass approach where there was no ability to have two-way conversations.   At times, the only direct feedback was from the journalist at the media outlet (whether they chose to write our story or not).

Consumers today want to drive and control their own media, so it’s harder to reach them through traditional media outreach.

If brands don’t customize their stories, then they end up as noise on the receiving end.

Web 2.0 sharing and social media collaboration allows us to build invaluable relationships quickly by tearing down the walls and allowing more transparency and openness, which humanizes the brand.By being more human and allowing employees to interact through social media makes it easier for customers to get to know the people behind their favorite brands.Helping customers through their concerns and issues aids in building relationships quickly. Having direct access to information, news and updates as well as promotions and discounts through social networks also builds the relationships at a faster rate.

We have the ability to form relationships by listening first and then engaging with help people.
The more swiftly we can identify the needs of our target public, the more quickly we can work to help them and to have a better relationship.

The broadcast model, which didn’t develop relationships but just blanketed the marketed with announcements, can’t exist in the social sphere.Social media is about two-way conversations and becoming the people you want to reach.

Of course, PR people are at the heart of listening and have been the skilled communicators advising brands about strategic communications for years. With our role as the communications strategists, research librarians, skilled listeners, conversationalists, savvy web marketers and even market experts/analysts, we have earned our seat at the boardroom table. PR has shown value over the years by contributing to a brand’s financial performance, reputation and brand management.Social media enhances these outcomes for the brand. As a result, our value will be recognized and compensated, as we continue to work with journalists and other groups to build stronger relationships with a brands public(s).

Even though we are changing our approach and tightening our own communication model to suit the needs of the public, once again the value that we deliver to the brand in long term warrants that same kind of recognition as our traditional days, as we produce tangible and measureable results with respect to participation, involvement, engagement and ROI.

Once our brands truly understand the new approach to communications it will less time to create better relationships and PR people will be recognized as a leading force in this new PR/social media approach.

Q3. Respect and relationships

AV: I was once told that there are no scoreboards when it comes to successful relationships – they work because there is no agenda and great mutual respect exists – can PR (and other related disciplines) realistically expect to reach that summit? Both with the people PR pros want to have relationships with but also in the eyes of the public?

DB: Yes, I believe that the new PR movement is reinventing the public relations industry so that we can have those relationships based on great mutual respect in the eyes of the people we want to reach and the general public.  We are working very hard to change our reputation of being known as “spin” doctors and PR flacks.  These stereotypes have been around for years and they were representative of an approach that lacked one-on-one communication, mutual respect and true relationship building efforts.  It appears that our industry fell into a complacent “mode” allowing our brands to think they were controlling the communication, massaging the messages that they wanted to put forward in the market while they simultaneously hid behind their corporate walls.  We weren’t helping to make our brands more open and transparent. Today, opening up the communication is an essential part of our PR approach.

Social media allows our brands to tear down the walls and to engage with the public (rather than shouting out messages).  Brands, as well as their PR people, have the opportunity to participate as meaningful resources, which helps to build relationships through connections with real people, in communities where they were never invited before.  A brand has to understand the cultures of various communities, because they are all different and so are the people or influencers who drive the communication.  All of this can be done by listening, observing and identifying as first steps, to pinpoint what’s important to the people in those communities and then participating by providing insight and valuable feedback.

The book, Trust Agents by Chris Brogan and Julien Smith also focuses on strengthening relationships and how being invited into a community means becoming one of its members, not just a “spammy” marketer with self-serving messages. Or, as Brogan and Smith discuss, you have to become “One of Us.”  In order to reach a summit of mutual respect in a relationship you must be one with the community.  Social media is peer-to-peer participation.  PR and marketing people need to take off their PR and marketing hats off and help their peers. We see this more and more as consumer study show that consumers trust their peers before their brands and then look toward the media and other competitive sources.

Q4. Sustaining relationships

AV: As I touched on in my introduction, the way you cultivated a relationship with me has led to us chatting quite regularly, and partly influenced my decision to go out and buy two of your books – is that type of effort sustainable all the time? What happens if / when you reach a tipping point and can’t be so generous, both online and in real life?

DB: I think that people who are like-minded will naturally be drawn to one another and just like building a relationship in the traditional realm, you will find different levels of friendship.  I wrote a blog post recently about the Twitter Relationship Stairway. Relationships come in many forms from your casual acquaintance all the way up the stairway to the trusted confidant.  Of course, we will only reach certain levels of friendship at any given time. We all have the ability to move each and every friendship up the stairway. However, with so many connections, one question surfaces: do we lower our friendship barriers and allow everyone to be become our friends, or do we hold higher standards for friendship as technology allows us to meet thousands of people.

I believe that we will be able to increase and even sustain the number of meaningful relationships, as we filter out the noise in our own networks and focus on the deep conversations and the people who have the most meaning for us.  We pick and choose our “friends” based on social capital and the value they bring to us each day.  It will be easier to organize our relationships through technology, and because open ID or Facebook Connect, for example, enables us to bring our operating systems wherever we go, our conversations will be connected as a result.  Although our human network will traverse across several platforms, we will have our closest confidants with us at all times.

In addition, we will see more technology blending our media, for instance Twitter Media is a perfect example of how TV and Twitter combine for engagement and deeper interaction with respect to a TV viewing experience and the communities that congregate to discuss them.  Our experience is blended where we are entertained and we can chat with our friends about a program, which consumes less time then if we were to watch a television show and then pick up the telephone to call and discuss the show with five friends who watched the same program.

Consumers thrive on participation and interaction.  Looking at the differences between Forrester’s 2008 and 2009 Technographics Ladder reveals that adult U.S. consumers are participating more in social networks, moving up the Social Technographics Ladder to be social media creators at the top of the ladder.  It’s consumer behavior that drives this movement and the technology facilitates their actions.  With that said, we will learn to filter, maintain and keep our closest networks with us (groups comprised of a trusted circle of people) while we review and select how other levels of friendship change and grow, as we continue on our social media paths.
__________________________________
I can't thank Deirdre enough for taking the time to put so much thought behind the responses to these questions.

It is this thinking which makes 'Putting the Public Back in Public Relations' such a great read - Deirdre and Brian really challenge what has become the status quo and deliver some very practical, and at times, confronting advice about how we can improve and evolve as an industry.

If you are interested in learning more about this book, or the three others Deirdre has written, visit her blog at www.deirdrebreakenridge.com.

You can also keep in touch with her via Twitter.

Now, I imagine that has stirred up some comments...don't keep them to yourself...share them via the box below...

Saturday, 17 April 2010

10 More Free Social Media Tools Every PR Pro Should Master (Part Two)

By Adam Vincenzini

(As featured in Social Media Today)

A couple of weeks ago I compiled a list of 10 social media tools I believe every PR pro should master by the end of 2010.

The response to the post was phenomenal and prompted me to look at some more tools that might be worth adding to the 'must master' list.

So, without further ado, here is round two...

10 More Online Tools Every PR Pro Should Master - Part Two

TweetChat

Live Twitter chats are gaining in popularity everyday as it allows for a condensed period of conversation which can be moderated / led, achieving the best results for participants and organizers.

Most PR people will have to take part in one of these conversations at some point and one of the better tools is TweetChat which allows you to follow a subject / hashtag and and makes taking part in a live chat really simple.

PR Value: Several benefits to this one, but mostly it allows for real-time observation and participation in conversations that might be of interest to your clients / brands.

mobiReadyMippin

The future of web is mobile. Fact. But is your website / blog optimized for interaction on a mobile device?

mobiReady runs a quick test to assess how ready your site is for mobile use, providing you with a snapshot of how it might look on particular handsets.

If it turns out your site isn't 'ready for mobile' you might want to consider Mippin - a free service which creates a mobile version of your site in a matter of seconds.

PR Value: If you want as many people as possible to access your content, then this is a 'no-brainer' - get it done!

Addictomatic

I didn't put this in the first edition of this series at the expense of Social Mention - but they really are two very different tools.

Addictomatic is an 'at-a-glance' dashboard which looks at mentions across the major social platforms - Blogs, Twitter, Digg, YouTube, Flickr and more.

PR Value: This is a great way to stay on top of brand / campaign mentions at any point in the day. What I like to do with this one is set up several searches, save them in my favourites / bookmarks, and check in on them 2-3 times a day. It occasionally misses things, but is pretty good for a free tool.

PostRank

PostRank does what it sounds like it should: ranks the quality of posts based on a set of variables.

If you see something with a PostRank '10' next to it, that's a pretty good indication it's a decent post.

PR Value: This is great to ascertain the value of content, providing a method / system to ranking posts in order of importance. The plugin available here is also a nice way to arrange your Google reader.

HootSuite

I think most people are aware of Hootsuite.

It is the easiest way to manage multiple social media accounts, especially across Twitter and Facebook, and it's scheduling system is a thing of beauty.

The associated analytics system isn't bad either...one of my favourite tools going around.

PR Value: Great for managing campaigns on a small / mid-sized scale.



Twitter Search - Advanced

We all know that Twitter is a great way to see what people are talking about.

Twitter Search (Advanced) is a great way to look back at what is being said about a particular topic, person, hashtag, brand etc

PR Value: Allows you to select exact time and origin details regarding a subject you are monitoring.

BoardTracker

This is something I use for my clients at Paratus Communications an awful lot.

It allows you to run searches on topics / key words that are being discussed in forums or discussion boards.

The great thing about BoardTracker is that it can tell you who is contributing to which topics and ranks them in order of frequency.

PR Value: This helps you ensure you are listening in the right places and taking note of the right people.

WhatTheTrend

I didn't realise how valuable this one was until a recent campaign I ran which was built around a 'hashtag'.

This allows you to define the details of a tag / trend, and in a way, claim 'ownership' of that tag.

PR Value: This is an incredibly powerful way of linking a brand to a topic but in a much more subtle way.

FeedBurner

FeedBurner is a service that helps generate a feed for your site / blog - it then helps deliver content and provides stats on usage.

PR Value: Running a blog? This will help measure its impact / popularity in an easy-to-digest way.

TwazzUp

As a friend pointed out the other day, this is a TERRIBLE name, but a GREAT tool.

It's another real-time search facility, but it's interface is what makes it great.

See what is being said by who, how influential those people are and how many people are taking an active interest.

PR Value: A handy way to see which influencers are attached to certain topics.

Now what?

Go and give these tools a try and see if they add value to your day.

As always, remember that successful communications activity doesn't begin and end with the tools.

They help get things done, and are great as far as listening goes, but they can be pointless if they aren't used in the right way.

Successful communications activity starts by first defining your situation, developing a route and then delivering that solution - these tools can help with each part of this process.

Enjoy!

Adam Vincenzini

If you liked this post, feel free to subscribe to this blog here or follow me on Twitter.

Tuesday, 13 April 2010

Has Twitter made my Mum 'invisible'?

By Adam Vincenzini

My Mum, who I love dearly, was our local council's worst nightmare when I was growing up.

Roadworks, a flickering light, even littering, my Mum was a one woman vigilante, firing letters off on a semi-daily basis to 'the man' asking for things to get 'sorted'.

If something wasn't done, every coffee shop in the neighbourhood would have soon heard about it, others would starting voicing their disapproval, and a response usually followed pretty quickly.

Today, this handy work is increasingly being carried out via social media channels.

But my Mum doesn't use social media.

My Mum, as she quite fairly points out, would rather be out taking the dog for a walk than glued to her laptop or phone, tweeting, checking-in or posting.

So, has my Mum lost her 'voice'?

Last week I watched with some interest when James Whatley (@whatleydude) made a comment about an anonymous brand / service (see below).



James has in excess of 5,000 followers on Twitter, operates a popular blog (The Really Mobile Project) and according to Klout is one of the top 100 most influential UK Twitter users.

Now, if James had dropped a brand name into that Tweet, I'd bet my house (if I owned one!) that the brand in question would have responded in a matter of seconds (assuming they were doing their job properly).

Why?

As a brand, you'd quite like James to say something positive about you rather than negative as his view can potentially shape the opinions of thousands...in an instant.

But what about my Mum?

Is she now invisible?

Should she think about using Twitter / social media to regain her voice?

Is this a compelling enough reason for everyone to use social media in some shape or form?

Do brands still take 'old school' feedback seriously?

I don't know the answer, but you might...

Sunday, 11 April 2010

Where are the 'vertical' social media specialists?

"You are what you think about all day long." - Robert Schuller

PR agencies specialize in 60 major market sectors according to ActiMedia.

Sports, FMCG, Transport, Drinks, Music, Charity / Non-Profit and Retail are just a handful of them.

Most agency practices and in-house teams are grouped together based on this specialist knowledge, especially in relation to having in-depth knowledge of 'their' media.

But (there's always a 'but'), I very rarely see blog posts or comments in relation to specialist social media in any 'one' sector - anything I see tends to be about general platforms / channels / trends.

It might be time to consider a change...

Knowledge acquisition vs knowledge application

It makes sense for everyone in marketing related fields to want to get a handle on social media.

It would have been the same when TV burst onto the scene and when the internet first emerged - understanding how they worked enabled appropriate messaging to be crafted to suit each platform.

Without devaluing it too much, I don't think that too many people within any organisation have to know social media, as a channel, inside-out.

While it is important to have someone playing the evangelist role and educating people about major trends and developments, it is simply another channel.

What is probably a great deal more important is knowing the blogs, influencers and conversation drivers in the sector you're responsible for.

That knowledge, coupled with knowledge of the more traditional media in a sector, becomes incredibly valuable (incredibly quickly) because it can be APPLIED.

How to 'get vertical' in social media

In theory, this shouldn't be any different to bolstering your knowledge of an element of traditional media, but a few minor tweaks might help make it happen more quickly.

Here are a few suggestions to get started...
  1. Firstly, know the sector(s) you want to focus on - the narrower your four focus, the greater applicable knowledge you'll yearn
  2. Make understanding the social media 'targets' in your sector part of your regular routine - if you spend 30 minutes each morning reading the finance sections of the papers, take 15 minutes from there and put it towards reading key financial blogs (and subscribe to a manageable amount)
  3. Start a blog about what's happening in your sector - this can be as simple as creating a Posterous site and aggregating any relevant information - but keep it specific
  4. Follow key conversation drivers in the sector you are interested in on Twitter - and actually engage with them, get to know what interests them (sites like Klout can help here)
  5. If you can't find those people immediately, follow conversations about the topics you are interested in and then key people will emerge from there 
  6. Keep records of any contact / conversations you have with them, don't let that intelligence go to waste
  7. Make comments on blog posts in the sectors you are interested in, show a real interest
  8. Produce a weekly wrap about what has happened in your sector, not just social media, but all, bringing the whole picture together - this could simply be a word cloud / wordle
  9. Finally, ask questions - apart from observing, the only way to understand how someone likes to be engaged is to ask them
Now, I know this seems like basic stuff, and maybe I just follow too may people interested in the broader topic of social media and communications, but I couldn't find that many people doing this when I had a search the other day (check out the AllTop Social Media page versus the Sports Marketing page as an example).

In fact, if someone could point me in the direction of 60 people who specialize in the 60 major sectors that exist, I'd take each one out to dinner personally and thank them for how invaluable they are.

What's in it for you?

Everything.

I can't think of too many examples in life where being a specialist about a topic / sector plays out badly for that person in question.

So, if you have been wondering what social media presence might be right for you or how to make social media fulfill some more practical needs, this might be an option to take.

Communications students might also want to adopt this approach.

If you spend a year looking at one sector as opposed to the practice of communications via some of the activity outlined above, I think you'd find getting that first job a little easier.

Why?

You can add practical value from day one, as opposed to providing theory only.

Anyone can talk about the best way to communicate, but only a few people can talk about the best way to communicate to doctors - that is invaluable.

Can anyone highlight some great vertical social media bloggers / specialists?

Are there too many general social media blogs out there?

I'd love to know what you think.

Adam

Staying connected...

If you'd like to stay connected via Twitter, you can find me here.

If you'd like to link up on Facebook, click here.

Or, if you'd like to subscribe to this blog, you can do that here as well.

Thursday, 8 April 2010

10 Free Social Media Tools Every PR Pro Should Master In 2010

By Adam Vincenzini

(Note: Part 2 of this series is available here)

I'm always a bit hesitant when it comes to writing posts about social media tools.

However, on this occasion I think the tools / resources I'm about to walk you through MUST be part of a modern communicator's arsenal, if not today, then by the end of 2010.

For some of you, these might seem basic, for others, they might seem a little foreign, but no matter which camp you are in, they should be part of your daily routine...no excuses!!


AllTop

AllTop is an incredible resource. For those who know it, you'll agree that it truly is an online magazine rack for some of the best blogs going around.

The site is broken down by subject and gives you direct access to the topics / authors you are interested in.

PR Value: Not sure about which blogs are prominent in which sector? This is a great place to start.

Social Mention

This is a really compact and easy-to-use monitoring tool.

It may not be the most robust one in existence, but it can give you a pretty decent look at brand / subject mentions across blogs, microblogs, video sharing sites, social networks and much more.

PR Value: Provides a quick reference look at what's recently been said about your subject of interest.

Bing real-time Twitter search

This is a great way of seeing what's hot / trending at any particular time.

The beauty of this service is that it features real-time snippets of the most shared links in relation to the subject you are interested in. And, it all occurs in real-time.

PR Value: It allows you to get the source of popular discussions, allowing you to trace it's development.

Klout

Although it's dangerous to get too caught up in the 'influencer' debate, this tool is probably as close as you'll get to getting an idea of who is driving which conversations.

Not every single social media user has signed up to Klout so you may miss a few people, but chances are you'll get a decent picture of the scene you're interested in.

PR Value: This will allow you to identify some of the key conversation drivers in the areas you are interested in.

BackTweets

This is a really neat and easy-to-use tool.

Simply enter a URL into the search bar and it will provide you with a list with every tweet that has ever contained a link / reference to that website.

PR Value: If you are running a campaign and want to see how much traffic has been driven to the 'target' of your activity, type it in here and you'll get an idea of how much that site address is being shared.



Wordle

If you haven't heard of this one, I guarantee it'll become a favourite pretty quickly.

Wordle creates 'word clouds' based on the content of a blog / any site with an RSS feed (not sure what an RSS feed is, click here)

PR Value: Want to creatively present what a blog is all about? This does it for you in seconds. Especially useful if you want to get a quick overview about what a blogger writes / is passionate about.

Google Trends

Another great tool in gathering intelligence.

Google Trends will display the frequency in which a topic / subject is mentioned in chronological and country-by-country order.

PR Value: Planning on launching an activity? Run a quick search to see which time of year the world is talking about that subject the most.

BlogPulse

As far as blog specific search tools go, this one is right up there...and probably shades Google's Blog search on some areas. Very handy.

PR Value:  See who is writing about your brand or subject of interest in a flash.

Alexa

If you want to get a handle on the DNA of a website or Blog, this is a good place to start.

It will tell you how much traffic a site gets, where that traffic is coming from, whether it is gaining more traction etc

PR Value: Check how a site / blog you're looking after if going. Check on the competition. See where you need to focus more effort. Again, very handy.

SWiX

If you only use one tool a day, try and make it this one.

It is a really (really!) simple way of tracking activity across all of your social networks / platforms.

PR Value: At-a-glance intelligence, lovely.

As I said up top, tools are great if used in the right way.

And, the best tools are the ones which allow you to listen / observe, helping you gain a better understanding of the environment you're operating in.

If you're interested in some more sophisticated tools, drop me an email and I'll point you in the right direction.

And as always, thanks for supporting the COMMS corner.

Adam

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

Are the days of the 'inverted pyramid media release' over?

And, how 'newsful' is your content?

By Adam Vincenzini

In the world of user-led media, one form of content is always coveted by the recipient more than most.

Surprisingly, it's not something which always stirs debate.

And, it's not necessarily 'breaking' news.

The holy grail when it comes to social media is news that is useful. Or useful information that is 'new'.

Or as I've coined it for the purposes of today's post, 'newsful' content...let me explain why...

The increasing redundancy of 'news-only' content

'News', by its very definition and nature, has a finite lifespan.

In today's media landscape, where 'sharing' is so popular, this is even more true.

A classic 'news-only' story might pop up on your radar, possibly even trend for a few minutes and then will disappear just as quickly.

Put simply, being memorable in the current 'news' environment is incredibly challenging due to the user being totally OVER-EXPOSED to 'news' (note: even 'news' isn't necessarily 'news' anymore, view article here).

This is why content creators who approach social media in the same way they approach traditional media often fall short of their goals.

However, blending the two, can have the opposite effect and amplify the message...significantly.

This can be achieved through 'newsful' content.

The anatomy of 'newsful' content

Creating content that is NEW(S) and USEFUL can, and should be, quite basic.
  • 'Newsful' content is often characterised by a headline (or element) that includes something along the lines of '10 ways to do X' or '3 steps to achieve Y'.
  • It arms the recipient with news tools or new methods of doing something.
  • Examples of success / bringing the subject to life is usually a key feature.
  • It should be presented in a fairly timeless manner i.e. if referred to again in 12 months time it'd still be relevant (or 'updatable' by the creator so it remains relevant).
  • Video and audio elements generally make the content more useful to the recipient.
  • Additional resources and links should be easily accessible.
  • The format should be digestible / easy-to-scan.
  • Presentation / infographics add a significant degree of 'usefulness'
  • Ideally, it should also solve a problem.
And importantly, the way the angle is initially shaped to attract attention from the intended recipient / user must be well thought through.

The best way to do this is to blend something newsy / topical into the opening parts of your content, making it your 'hook' but not the 'crux' - both elements need equal weighting - this is a very different approach to the traditional 'inverted pyramid methodology' associated with media releases and PR.



This may not seem like rocket science, because it isn't, but just creating 'straight news angles' will not achieve optimum traction via social platforms.

Your content must not only be interesting but (ideally) it must be USEFUL, HELPFUL and ADD VALUE to the recipient...and be TIMELESS.

If you can do that, you've also made your content REUSABLE and RECYCLABLE - in other words, you've made sharing it a much more attractive proposition.

So, the next time you create something, ask yourself whether you've ticked both the 'new(s)' and 'useful' boxes - if you have, you stand a better chance of seeing your message(s) appear in more than one place...which is usually pretty nice.


Apart from the questionable term ('newsful'), do you think this approach has merit / do you adopt it regularly?

Can 'news-only' content achieve multi-channel cut through?

What else makes content useful to a user / recipient?

Does a 'social media release' cover all this off?

I'd love to know what you think.

Adam

Sunday, 4 April 2010

Live Events Need Twitter #Hashtags 'Built-In' Not 'Bolted-On'

By Adam Vincenzini

In the last 10 years I've been part of countless project teams involved with promoting events including The Ashes (Cricket), The Commonwealth Games, various music festivals / concerts and more.

I can think of several occasions during that period where PR wasn't fully integrated into the process until it was too late to shape strategy and / or positioning (in fact, in most cases it was a relatively last-minute 'bolt-on').

While this has improved over time, it appears social media integration is the latest to suffer from 'bolt-on' syndrome as opposed to being 'built-in' to the project team from day one.

To bring this to life, let's take a look at one social media channel, Twitter, and how it can significantly increase engagement leading up to, during and post 'live events'.

'Live events' and Twitter - Why?

Twitter is a great channel for brands and organisations to use when it comes to events that rely on participation to thrive, whether that's 'in the flesh' or 'virtually' (no matter the size).

A lot has also been made of late in regards to the positive impact Twitter is having on television programming, as it facilitates global conversations and interaction, which increases 'buzz' and interest.

It is a great example of social media amplifying traditional elements of the event marketing mix, making the participant feel even closer to the action.

I've compiled some thoughts as to how Twitter (as an example), if factored into event planning early enough, can significantly increase event 'presence' and 'engagement'.

'Live events' and Twitter - How?

If you were sitting in on that first project meeting, these are the types of questions you might want to ask / elements to keep in mind, especially in relation to #hashtags.

#Hashtag(s)

First, a quick reminder of what a Twitter #hashtag is courtesy of Mashable:

The hashtag is a favorite tool of conferences and event organizers, but it’s also a way for Twitter users to organize themselves: if everyone agrees to append a certain hashtag to tweets about a topic, it becomes easier to find that topic in search, and more likely the topic will appear in Twitter’s Trending Topics.
With that in mind, let's consider some questions you might want to ask...
  • What #hashtag(s) will users adopt when referring to your event?
  • Do you need to create an 'official' #hashtag?
  • Is there likely to be more than one term of reference in use?
  • Is the #hashtag unique / can it be duplicated? 
  • How many characters is it?
  • Is it memorable / distinguishable?
All of these questions will help in the creation of your strategy.

A good example is the NCAA Basketball Tournament which concludes this weekend (3-5 April, 2010).

Some of the #hashtags in use have been #NCAA, #NCAABB, #FinalFour, #Final4, #MarchMadness plus numerous team #hashtags.

In an ideal world, a marketer would like to see one #hashtag adopted as it increases the chance of becoming a 'trending topic' which will attract interest from other people wondering "why is the world talking so much about X" - in other words, it encourages the age-old "why aren't I in on that?" mentality which is very powerful way of encouraging interest from new audiences.

From a retention perspective, it makes people already involved in the event feel like they are part of something 'big' - again, another very powerful human need.

Making it happen

Now, your #hashtag is only one element of your overall approach, but for the 'user' it is one of the easiest ways to connect to your event / product...so it is vital to make it easy for them to find, adopt and promote it.

Let's assume you've answered the questions posed earlier, and a mutual consensus has been reached as to the #hashtag that will be in use (whether that is user-led or product/event driven).

How do you then ensure mass adoption / use?

The answer is that you can't (sorry!), but you can do enough to give it the best chance possible, including:
  • Publicising its existence via the official event Twitter channel, regularly and consistently
  • If it is a televised event, encourage your rights holder to feature it 'in broadcast'
  • Feature the #hashtag in relevant places on the event website / blog i.e. media section, event attendee section etc
  • Include it in the tangible materials at the event i.e. signage, printed materials, scoreboards etc
  • If there is a PA system, encourage its use via that platform
By doing these things you are only enhancing and extending the reach of your event, which for all parties involved adds considerable value.

This is only the tip of the iceberg.

To ensure full value is achieved from the social media element of your event plan, you need more than just a solid #hashtag approach, but it's a big part...don't let it slip.

What are your thoughts on #hashtags?

What other questions would you pose?

What other avenues / channels would you use to promote your desired event #hashtag?

I'd love to know what you think.

Adam Vincenzini
_____________

Adam is the lead social media consultant at Paratus Communications, London.